Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 26.06.2025 01:03
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Nuclear rocket engine for Moon and Mars - European Space Agency
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Just in the last 5 years:
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Fact-checking unsubstantiated claims linking Gov. Walz to Minnesota lawmakers’ shootings - PBS
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Mundfish Reveals The Cube, An MMORPG Shooter Set In The Atomic Heart Universe - Game Informer
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
When the sun dies, could life survive on the Jupiter ocean moon Europa? - Space
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Thank you.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Musk-Trump rupture poses a serious threat to NASA and Pentagon programs - The Washington Post
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Neuroscientists find individual differences in memory response to amygdala stimulation - PsyPost
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
WBD Shareholders Nix David Zaslav’s 2024 Pay Package In Non-Binding Vote - Deadline
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
What’s next?